Drink Driving Defence Solicitors

Get The Best Defence With Our Award-Winning Solicitors

"The best criminal solicitors in London.. the prosecution dropped all the charges!"


Blown over the limit? When keeping your licence could mean keeping your livelihood make sure you have the best possible representation both in and outside court.

If the correct procedures have not been followed when the police took your breath, blood, or urine sample you may have a defence to a charge of drink driving. Or, if you can show a special reason such as someone, unbeknown to you, having spiked your drink before you started driving this might also save you from disqualification.

Without legal advice to explore all the options and avenues available to you, you could be looking at a mandatory 12-month disqualification and a large fine (means tested) for a first offence.

The Law

The law makes it an offence to drink and drive if you drive or try to drive on a road or other public place after “consuming so much alcohol that the proportion of it in his breath, blood or urine exceeds the prescribed limit.”

The legal drink driving alcohol limit is -

  • ·Breath - 35 milligrams per 100 millilitres of breath

  • ·Blood alcohol level for driving is 80 milligrammes of alcohol per 100 millilitres

  • ·Urine - 107 milligrammes per 100 millilitres of urine.

At the Roadside

If you are stopped by the police whilst driving, you may be asked to provide a roadside breath sample. If you refuse to provide a sample you could be arrested, taken to the police station and charged with refusing to provide a specimen at the roadside – an offence which carries a minimum driving ban of 12 months.

At the Police Station

If you provide a positive reading at the roadside, you could be taken to a police station to provide a sample. If you refuse to provide a sample at the police station, you could be charged with refusing to provide a specimen at the police station – an offence which carries a minimum driving ban of 12 months. You can ask for a lawyer, but the police do not have to delay the breath sample procedure for you to receive legal advice.

If you provide a positive sample at the police station, you may be charged with drink driving. The police will take your prints and photographs.

If convicted the endorsement code on your licence will be DR10 for Driving or attempting to drive with alcohol levels above the limit.

Defences for Drinking and Driving Allegations

Once you receive a summons or charge sheet you should take legal advice. The main defences for drink driving offences are:

  • The Hip Flask defence i.e., the alcohol that took you over the legal limit was consumed after you stopped driving - see our Case Study for Client B

  • Proving that you were not in fact driving.

  • Showing the vehicle was not driven on a road or in a public place.

  • Challenging the reliability of the police evidence - see our Case Study for Client A

  • Raising a medical defence such as Auto- Brewery Syndrome 

At your first consultation we will tell you whether we think you may have a defence and of what we need to do – obtain an expert’s report for example – to prove this. As our case studies demonstrate, having an experienced driving lawyer review your file may reveal a defence to what would otherwise seem a straightforward case.

Once you have been advised on the realistic prospects of successfully defending the charge, we can devise a strategy for fighting your case in court. For example, we may want to show that the police did not follow the strict procedure for obtaining a breath, blood or urine sample from you or there were defects in the paperwork.

Avoiding a Ban – Special Reasons

A mandatory disqualification for a minimum period of 12 months will be imposed by the Court if you are convicted for drink driving unless you can show special reasons.

If you can show special reasons as to why you were driving whilst over the limit, then the Court has the power not to disqualify you or to disqualify you for a shorter period.  A Special Reasons argument is not technically a defence to the charge but an argument in mitigation.

The main examples of Special Reasons Arguments are -

  • The Spiked drinks defence – you never realised you were intoxicated above the legal limit as without your knowledge your drinks were laced

  • Emergency driving - In an emergency you had no choice but to drive

  • Short Distance driving – without putting any other drivers or pedestrians at risk you only drove a very short distance

See our case studies for examples of our track record of successfully winning special reasons arguments. If we think you have grounds to apply to avoid disqualification under this procedure, we will list your case for a special reasons hearing and advise you on whether we need expert evidence to support your case.


Special Reasons – Case Study

Client D Client D was a nurse charged with drink driving.  D had been drinking at home. D was asked by her neighbour to move her car as it was partially obstructing the driveway.  Client D drove her vehicle a distance of two yards but collided into the rear of another parked vehicle.  A member of the public called the police who duly attended.  Client D was taken to a local police station and breathlysed. She was found to over the limit.  She was later charged with drink driving.

D was represented by Patrick O’Hanlon at Court, D pleaded guilty to drink driving but raised Special Reasons on the grounds of distance driven. A special reasons hearing was requested. At the special reasons hearing the Bench accepted the argument and D was not disqualified.

Shortening the Ban - Drink Drive Rehabilitation Course

You can reduce your period of disqualification by 25% by completing a Drink Driver Rehabilitation Course. If the Court agrees to offer you the option of completing the course, it will fix a deadline by which the course must be completed.  If it the course is concluded by the deadline, then the disqualification imposed must be served in full.

Recent changes to the law mean that the  Court no longer has the power to extend this deadline, a fact many clients are often not told of which means they may be unable to complete the course in time.

Penalties

In summary:

  • First Offence – you can expect a 12 Month Minimum Ban and a substantial (means tested) fine.

  • Second Offence - (if within 10 years of first) you can expect a 3 year minimum ban and a Large Fine (means tested)

Sentencing Guidelines

The Sentencing Guidelines Council publishes guidelines for the sentences that can be imposed for drink driving based on the level of alcohol found in breath, blood or urine sample.

Excess Alcohol (drive/attempt to drive) (Revised 2017)

Road Traffic Act 1988, s.5(1)(a)

Effective from: 24 April 2017

Triable only summarily
Maximum: Unlimited fine and/or 6 months
Offence range: Band B fine – 26 weeks’ custody

Level of alcohol Starting point Range Disqualification Disqualification if 2nd offence in 10 years
Breath (μg) Blood (mg) Urine (mg)
120–150 and above 276–345 and above 367–459 and above 12 weeks’ custody High level community order – 26 weeks’ custody 29 – 36 months (Extend if imposing immediate custody)
36 – 60 months
90 – 119 207–275
275– 366 Medium level community order Low level community order – High level community order 23 – 28 months 36 – 52 months
60 – 89 138–206 184–274 Band C Fine Band C Fine – Low level community order 17 – 22 months 36 – 46 months
36 – 59 81–137 108–183 Band C Fine Band B Fine – Band C fine 12 – 16 months 36 – 40 months

Endorsement Codes

Endorsement codes which begin with the letters DR relate to driving offences which involve alcohol.

The following codes must stay on your licence for 11 years from the date of conviction:

  • DR10 – Driving or attempting to drive with alcohol levels above the limit

  • DR20 – Driving or attempting to drive while unfit through drink

  • DR30 – Driving or attempting to drive then failing to supply a specimen for analysis

  • DR31 – Driving or attempting to drive then refusing to give permission for analysis of a blood sample that was taken without consent due to incapacity

  • DR61 – Refusing to give permission for analysis of a blood sample that was taken without consent due to incapacity in circumstances other than driving or attempting to drive.

The above endorsement codes will be accompanied by between three and 11 penalty points, depending on the offence.

The following codes must stay on your licence for four years from the date of the offence:

  • DR40 – In charge of a vehicle while alcohol level above the limit

  • DR50 – In charge of a vehicle while unfit through drink

  • DR60 – Failure to provide a specimen for analysis in circumstances other than driving or attempting to drive

  • DR70 – Failing to provide specimen for breath test

  • DR90 - Drunken in charge of a motor vehicle

The above endorsement codes will be accompanied by ten penalty points.

Case Studies – Drink Driving

Client A. Client A was arrested on suspicion of drink driving and conveyed to the custody suite at a nearby police station. After being released under investigation A contacted Patrick O’Hanlon of BSQ.  Upon speaking to BSQ, A confirmed that the police asked for a sample of urine rather than a breath reading as there had been an issue with the breath intoxyliser machine at the station.  When A described the procedure in respect of the urine sample, it became apparent that the police officer who had conducted the procedure had not done so correctly and mishandled the urine sample. BSQ made several requests were made for CCTV footage from the custody suite of the sample process which was not provided.  Written representations were submitted on behalf of the client to the authorities buy BSQ. Eventually a decision was taken by the police to take no further action against A.

Client B. Client B was charged with drink driving and appeared at a local Magistrates Court.  B was arrested at his home address after a member of the public called police after seeing B leave a pub car park in his vehicle believing that he had been drinking earlier. When B was breathalysed in the police station, he was found to be over the drink drive limit. B told the arresting officer that he had not drunk any alcohol in the pub and but had consumed three bottles of Budweiser at his address after arriving home from the pub.

Patrick O’Hanlon of BSQ represented B at trial. B pleaded Not Guilty to drink driving and raised the defence post driving consumption.  An expert report was obtained with a “back calculation” of his alcohol reading in breath. This showed his breath reading at the station was consistent with the account he relied on. In addition, BSQ obtained the Body Worn Video Footage (BWV)  obtained from the arresting officer which showed the client advising the officer of his explanation in the police station. B was found Not Guilty at trial after the court viewed the BWV, heard live evidence from B and reviewed our expert’s report.

Client C. Client C was charged with drink driving. C was represented by Roger Sahota. C pleaded not guilty and his case was listed for trial at the Magistrates Court. During the trial submissions were made to the Court by the defence that the charge sheet against C contained a typographical error and the registration number identifying his vehicle was incorrect.  The Prosecution failed to apply to amend the charges against C to correct the error. At the end of the case the defence made a submission of no case to answer as the vehicle driven by C had not been correctly identified. The submission was upheld and the charges against C dismissed.

If you find yourself facing an investigation or prosecution for a motoring offence, please call our offices on our 24 hour helpline on 0203 858 0853.


  The level of service they provide is uncommonly good
— A M

  The best criminal law solicitors in London... the prosecution dropped all the charges!
— L F

  My experience with Berkeley Square Solicitors was fantastic. My case was resolved with in a week.
— K H

  My experience with the Berkeley Square Solicitors was amazing. They successfully closed my case with my best interests in mind.
— J S

  We did a few call enquires, and knew instantly when we spoke to BSQ that we could trust them to get the best outcome. We are very pleased with the outcome.
— L F

  One of the best professional lawyers I have ever met. He handled my case very well and the case was dropped, i would highly recommend.
— D I